marriagebroker: (Default)
marriage broker ([personal profile] marriagebroker) wrote in [community profile] perfectmatch2025-06-16 08:44 am

week three | mingle

No outright changes this week either. Week three rolls around, braced for impact as ever. The estate is still intact, the contestants are still motivated, things are looking good.

Well, aside from the fact you all had a blackout this weekend. That wasn't so good.

Either way, when Monday rolls around, Wei Wuxian seems to be in a cheery mood as he greets everyone Monday morning.

"Everyone, come here, come here. I have an announcement!"

Better go see what that's about, huh?

Boom Boom Room | Dates | Property Damage
Truth Booth Voting | Match Ceremony Voting
hexensabbat: (if they are also trying to murder you)

[personal profile] hexensabbat 2025-06-19 05:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah. The way I look at it, Maya-Aventurine is the high risk, high reward scenario.

Personally, I think Verso-Nico's a done deal. They've gotta be a match. So that's the low reward, low risk option.
nrangel: (more than one source)

[personal profile] nrangel 2025-06-19 06:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Do we want to be taking high risks right now though is the question? Especially after how badly we flubbed it last time, a low risk set might not be bad.
hexensabbat: (Not that I'm saying there were bugs)

[personal profile] hexensabbat 2025-06-19 06:02 pm (UTC)(link)
That's the question. I don't think we'll flub it as bad this time, but... the chance is always there.

And if we get a match in the Truth Booth, we're safe for the Match Ceremony for sure again. Might be worth going for the low hanging fruit.
reverso: (🎼 028)

[personal profile] reverso 2025-06-19 06:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Low-hanging fruit. Don't I feel special.

[He's kidding.]
hexensabbat: (rate us five stars to unlock)

[personal profile] hexensabbat 2025-06-19 06:06 pm (UTC)(link)
[She just beams at him.]

Awww, Verso, it just means we're all really confident about hinging our bets on you!
reverso: (🎼 027)

[personal profile] reverso 2025-06-19 06:13 pm (UTC)(link)
Thanks. No pressure.

[But there is a marked difference between this truth booth's discussion and last week's where Verso's demeanor is concerned.]

I do think placing our bets in a way to shield us from another blackout should be the priority, though. Regardless of what information is gleaned where.
hexensabbat: (Squashed some bugs)

[personal profile] hexensabbat 2025-06-19 06:14 pm (UTC)(link)
[More sincerely:]

That mean you're up for going in this week?

(no subject)

[personal profile] reverso - 2025-06-19 18:19 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] hexensabbat - 2025-06-19 18:21 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] reverso - 2025-06-19 18:28 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] irreversal - 2025-06-19 21:01 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] reverso - 2025-06-19 21:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] irreversal - 2025-06-19 21:57 (UTC) - Expand
crimsin: (🩸 129)

[personal profile] crimsin 2025-06-19 06:13 pm (UTC)(link)
[ Bumps shoulders with him. ]

We are in the same boat, merle. How brave are you feeling?
reverso: (🎼 024)

[personal profile] reverso 2025-06-19 06:18 pm (UTC)(link)
The idea's still a rather intimidating one, but that was never going to change.

[That was just, like. The default.]

I'm keeping my word. If the consensus is for us to go, then I've no problem with it.
crimsin: (🩸 040)

[personal profile] crimsin 2025-06-19 08:14 pm (UTC)(link)
I am glad to hear it. If our instincts are right, then I am more than happy to serve as a safety net for everyone's wishes.
nrangel: (plays ominously in the distance)

[personal profile] nrangel 2025-06-19 06:18 pm (UTC)(link)
[ If the fruit is big enough, then it'll hang low. That's nothing at all to feel ashamed about.

This comment is not going to be deleted, even though it's not being said out loud. Serpilia is thinking it and just giving him a mysterious smile she will not be explaining, but she thinks he might get at this point.
]
reverso: (🎼 036)

[personal profile] reverso 2025-06-19 06:31 pm (UTC)(link)
[MA'AM THERE ARE MORE IMPORTANT MATTERS TO BE THINKING ABOUT RIGHT NOW 😭]

(no subject)

[personal profile] nrangel - 2025-06-19 18:36 (UTC) - Expand
nrangel: (there are no icons left)

[personal profile] nrangel 2025-06-19 06:06 pm (UTC)(link)
I think what it comes down to is how much people care about finding all of the matches verses finding at least enough to keep our wishes safe at the end.
hexensabbat: (Weave added a spell checker)

[personal profile] hexensabbat 2025-06-19 06:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah. It's a good point.

Gotta also remember that we won't get any wishes at all if we don't get it right. But, eh. I'm confident that we can figure it out whichever pair we send, so I'm not too fussed.
nrangel: (the only fun one on the vacay)

[personal profile] nrangel 2025-06-19 06:19 pm (UTC)(link)
It sounds like we're still leaning to a couple that have really high probabilities of being right regardless, so you're right. We'll probably be safe regardless.

(no subject)

[personal profile] hexensabbat - 2025-06-19 18:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] nrangel - 2025-06-19 18:33 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] hexensabbat - 2025-06-19 18:45 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] nrangel - 2025-06-19 19:15 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] hexensabbat - 2025-06-20 00:50 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] nrangel - 2025-06-20 03:01 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] hexensabbat - 2025-06-21 01:48 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] nrangel - 2025-06-21 01:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] hexensabbat - 2025-06-21 02:49 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] nrangel - 2025-06-22 02:32 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] hexensabbat - 2025-06-25 01:13 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] nrangel - 2025-07-03 04:29 (UTC) - Expand
ordimame: (18)

[personal profile] ordimame 2025-06-19 06:02 pm (UTC)(link)
[. . . points!!]

Yeah! Math!

[he did not base his argument on logic or math, sorry Ringo]
hexensabbat: (rate us five stars to unlock)

[personal profile] hexensabbat 2025-06-19 06:03 pm (UTC)(link)
[She fingerguns in response, and:]

You didn't do shit when it comes to math, Edamura!
ordimame: (29)

[personal profile] ordimame 2025-06-19 06:05 pm (UTC)(link)
[fingerguns RIGHT BACK]

Yeah! I sure didn't!!
phenomerom: (072)

[personal profile] phenomerom 2025-06-19 06:11 pm (UTC)(link)
I wonder if it's wise to simply assume we're correct about Mr. Nico and Mr. Verso, though.

[ i, personally, am getting sick and tired of writing these honorifics all the time i'm gonna fucken kill rom ]

I think there are a few pairings this previous round that we were reasonably confident in, only for them to be struck down. Taking that into account -- I don't think it would be a bad idea to confirm if our general logic is correct with the low reward, low risk option before we must make pairings for the matching ceremony. And on the chance that we correctly identify a match with Mr. Nico and Mr. Verso, it would provide us with another safety net to prevent another worst-case scenario, no?
hexensabbat: (two Discord sew you can no)

[personal profile] hexensabbat 2025-06-19 06:13 pm (UTC)(link)
[She just flaps a hand at that, but it isn't a dismissive gesture so much as a casually acknowledging one.]

I'm fine with that. If Verso and Nico aren't a match, we're back to the drawing board with the other matches that week, so you're right that that'd, uh, suck.
gamboler: (35)

[personal profile] gamboler 2025-06-19 06:37 pm (UTC)(link)
High risk, high reward is always my preferred option. Depending on how you look at it, though, myself and Maya might be pretty low risk, too.

[ Is he going to lobby for a true chaos option? Maybe. ]
hexensabbat: (Hellooooooo?)

[personal profile] hexensabbat 2025-06-19 06:38 pm (UTC)(link)
[Hm?]

Yeah? How do you figure?

[She's Listening.]
gamboler: (077)

[personal profile] gamboler 2025-06-19 06:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Our names have still come up pretty frequently in these discussions. A true high-risk, high-reward choice would be Serpilia and Luka.
hexensabbat: (support the player)

[personal profile] hexensabbat 2025-06-19 06:50 pm (UTC)(link)
[Okay she can't argue that, but she rolls her eyes a little anyway, fond.]

Technically, Luka's percentages are better because he's already been in the booth with someone and had it crossed off the list, but your point is taken.

Why, don't like the idea of you and Maya being high risk, high reward? I thought that'd appeal to you.
gamboler: (051)

[personal profile] gamboler 2025-06-19 08:27 pm (UTC)(link)
[ Damn, she's got him there. ]

Because I'm almost certain that she's my match.

[ And that Nico and Verso are matched as well. His reasoning is based less in probability and more in emotions, though, which is out of the ordinary for him and that leaves him on footing his unfamiliar with. ]

Is it truly for the best to test something we're confident about?

(no subject)

[personal profile] hexensabbat - 2025-06-20 01:19 (UTC) - Expand